For the 10-year anniversary of An Inconvenient Truth, those of us who aren’t sold on massive use of taxpayer money for clean-energy projects are yet again labeled in denial about the science of climate change. Latest case in point: a rather fawning interview of Al Gore by WIRED magazine lacking questions about the impact of climate change legislation and subsidies on consumers (particularly lower-income folks), GDP growth and the current scientific state of today’s renewable energy sources. According to WIRED,  subsidy skeptics are borderline neanderthals enough to make an enlightened climate activist’s “brain explode.”In truth, many of us who don’t support behemoth public energy gambles are clear-eyed in understanding the impact these policies have on the poor and middle class–people who see energy costs as a higher proportion of their expenses than richer families. Thus, when countries attempt to shift to renewables too quickly, these shifts hurt the poor the most, as was the case in Germany, where trillions of dollars in experimental mandates and subsidies for clean energy, and a fearful shift away from nuclear energy, resulted in an increase in greenhouse gas emissions along with a major hit to consumers. As The Wall Street Journal reported:“Germany’s current path of increasingly high-cost energy will make the country less competitive in the world economy, penalize Germany in terms of jobs…
See original post: ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ Turns 10: Who Are the Real Science Deniers?